The dialog across the scarcity of licensed CPAs in the USA has turn into inescapable. Headlines, panels and white papers all echo the identical concern: we’d like extra CPAs. However beneath the floor of this pressing rallying cry lies a extra vital query — will we really want extra licensed accountants, or do we have to rethink how we assist and empower those already within the area?
Let me be clear: I am not penning this to power a predetermined resolution into the general public dialogue. I’ve spent years advocating for the removing of the 150-credit hour requirement and exploring different CPA pathways, however I have never landed on a single repair. That is as a result of the difficulty is way extra nuanced than merely growing provide.
As a school scholar, I bear in mind how aggressively universities pushed accounting as a serious, particularly towards enterprise college students. College encouragement felt extra like stress, and it was laborious to see the reasoning behind it. Wanting again, I acknowledge that the push to feed the CPA pipeline was half of a bigger, systemic effort — one which lacked transparency and infrequently ignored scholar readiness or curiosity.
Now, after a decade within the occupation, I can higher perceive the anxiousness behind these institutional efforts. However I’ve additionally come to see their limitations. The accounting occupation’s response to pipeline challenges has been cyclical and reactionary. Relatively than confronting the foundation causes, we have tried to patch the issue by specializing in the beginning of the pipeline — CPA candidates — with out addressing the fragility within the center.
Let me provide an analogy. Through the 2023 MLB season, physics professor Aaron Leanhardt collaborated with the New York Yankees to revamp their bats. His aim? Enhance hitting efficiency by reallocating the bat’s mass to the world that made probably the most contact with the ball — the candy spot. The consequence was a “torpedo bat” that set franchise data.
Think about the CPA pipeline as a baseball bat. Candidates are close to the deal with, companions on the finish cap, and the mid-career CPAs — those carrying the heaviest workload — are on the barrel’s candy spot. The occupation, nevertheless, is pouring sources into the deal with whereas treating the center like an afterthought. That is a mistake.
In response to the Wall Avenue Journal, over 300,000 accountants and auditors have left their jobs prior to now two years — a 17% decline. This exodus has been most vital amongst professionals aged 25–34 and 45–54. These aren’t simply numbers. They signify the most efficient, skilled and undervalued phase of the workforce. If that is our candy spot, why are we not doubling down on retaining and creating it?
In a
“Initiatives to enhance workforce member expertise, development and development would go a protracted option to making a distinction within the pipeline. It will additionally assist if we highlighted the choices and alternatives within the occupation,” stated Ellison-Taylor.
Can we actually advocate for extra CPA candidates when the occupation lacks the infrastructure and assist to maintain those we have already got?
In the meantime, the occupation is sluggish to embrace probably the most transformative device at our disposal: synthetic intelligence. CPAs right this moment can collaborate with giant language fashions and AI brokers to streamline work, increase effectivity and give attention to higher-level evaluation. But many professionals stay unaware of instruments like Anthropic’s Claude, Grok from xAI, or the actual potential of APIs and automation.
It is not nearly utilizing ChatGPT. It is about reimagining how CPAs work — with AI as a teammate, not a menace. The corporations that perceive this would be the first to adapt. People who do not will threat shedding expertise, relevance and purchasers.
As an alternative, we have to give attention to empowering current CPAs with actual instruments, clear profession paths and assist constructions that account for the trendy challenges of the job. We’d like regulatory flexibility, higher schooling on rising applied sciences, and a basic shift in how we view mid-career professionals — not as cogs in a pipeline, however because the engine of the occupation’s future.
In 1994, Eli Mason — previous president of the New York State Society of CPAs and former AICPA vp — warned in opposition to the creeping commercialization of public accountancy, saying it might value the occupation the belief of the general public it serves. That warning rings louder right this moment.
The way forward for accounting does not hinge on cranking out extra CPAs. It is dependent upon our willingness to put money into the people who find themselves already right here, doing the work — and doing it properly.
