Frankenstein’s Index Fund – CFA Institute Enterprising Investor

Editorial Team
6 Min Read


Arthur Frankenstein didn’t got down to create a monster. He had the very best scientific intentions. He hoped to create a dwelling being from, effectively, physique components. As Mary Shelley’s story performs out, we study that Frankenstein’s experiment ended badly.

A a lot much less grisly experiment started in 1911 in Massachusetts. That’s the place the primary statewide pension fund in america got here into being. It proved to be a way more profitable experiment however not with out its personal unexpected penalties.

As we speak, all 50 states preserve no less than one statewide pension plan. All however 5 have a number of statewide plans. After which there are all the town and county plans. Jurisdictions with a number of pension plans are the topic of this publish.

Diversification is a cardinal precept of prudent pension fund administration. The precept is written into fiduciary legislation in all places. Public plan trustees have been scrupulous of their efforts to diversify investments. They invariably set up an asset allocation plan for diversifying amongst asset courses. They rent a number of funding managers. They use index funds. Their returns hew to broad market indexes. For instance, my research point out that, on common, massive public fund returns have an R2 of 98% with these of the market. Public pension funds are diversified to the nth diploma.

Diversification Gone Haywire

Right here is the place issues start to get sticky. Giant public funds use a mean of greater than 150 asset managers.[1] A principle of environment friendly portfolio administration is that the investor doesn’t use energetic managers for diversification, which could be carried out way more cheaply with index funds. Hiring scads of managers is dear. I estimate that public pension funds, with their 35% common allocation to dear various investments and 20% or much less in index funds, incur funding bills of 100 to 150 bps per yr. They usually underperform market indexes by a like quantity. Trustees are getting their diversification, sure — however with woeful inefficiency.[2]

The Monster We Constructed

Issues worsen when there are a number of pension funds in a single jurisdiction. This leads to redundancy amounting to de facto consolidation of all the person funds, for that’s its bottom-line affect on taxpayers. Think about a taxpayer in Los Angeles. Their taxation is influenced by the efficiency of three metropolis pension funds, one county fund, and three statewide funds. The consolidated fund incorporates greater than 1000 actively managed portfolios with numerous particular person positions. One portfolio’s losers offset one other’s winners; funding bets by the a whole lot cancel each other out. The result’s an unholy index fund, patched collectively with out intention and giving rise to a monster of inefficient diversification.

There are $5 trillion of public outlined profit belongings in america. I estimate public plans waste $50 billion a yr via inefficient diversification. The waste provides to the already monumental burden of funding public pension plans, which in the end falls upon the taxpayers.

What’s the resolution? Just a few states, reminiscent of Minnesota, have a state board of funding. Though Minnesota has a number of statewide pension plans, their belongings are pooled for the aim of funding. This can be a step in the best path. However, as famous, particular person pension funds are usually inefficiently diversified, so there isn’t any assurance that merely pooling plan belongings will obtain the specified consequence. And state boards of funding sometimes omit native funds.

A surer various is to index public pension belongings the truth is. Jumbo-size, government-run pension funds working in a political goldfish bowl lack comparative benefits as buyers. Passive investing at subsequent to no price transforms the sport into one through which public funds could be constant winners.

Key Takeaways

Public pension plans might use index funds or appear to comply with market benchmarks, however in actuality, they:

  • Nonetheless make use of a whole lot of energetic managers
  • Tackle costly various investments
  • Find yourself with mixture portfolios that mirror the market however at a lot larger price

[1] See Aubry, J-P and Okay. Wandrei. 2020. “Inner vs. Exterior Administration for State and Native Pension Plans.” Middle for Retirement Analysis, Boston Faculty.

[2] See Ennis, R.M. 2025. “The Demise of Different Investments.” The Journal of Portfolio Administration (forthcoming). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5163511.

Share This Article