With the White Home downplaying the worth of quarterly reporting for corporations, traders face a well-known query: does the price of producing data outweigh the advantages?
Utilizing Robert Shiller’s long-run knowledge, this put up reveals that quarterly earnings include data that’s possible precious to each long-term allocators and short-term merchants. Its advantages, which I don’t try to quantify, needs to be weighed in opposition to any financial savings from less-frequent reporting.
Quarterly vs. Semi-Annual: What’s at Stake
The White Home this week referred to as for a change from quarterly to semi-annual earnings reporting. President Donald Trump argued that such a shift would save corporations time and cash.
That could be true. However would traders lose precious data?
To reply this query, I exploit earnings knowledge from Robert Shiller’s on-line knowledge from January 1970 (1970:1), the 12 months by which the Securities and Change Fee made quarterly earnings necessary, to 2025:6 to check relationships among the many change in three-month earnings, six-month earnings, and the development in earnings. I outline the development as a 61-month centered shifting common change in earnings. Particularly, I take a look at whether or not realizing three-month earnings’ modifications helps an investor higher estimate modifications within the longer-term development in earnings.
Chart 1 reveals three-month earnings in inexperienced, six-month earnings in pink, and development earnings in blue. Sequence begin in January 2000 (2000:1), fairly than 1970:1, for ease of visualization.
Chart 1. 3-month, 6-month, and development earnings, 2000:1 to 2025:6.
Supply: Robert Shiller on-line knowledge, creator calculations.
In fact, three-month earnings are choppier than six-month earnings. However it isn’t apparent from visible inspection that realizing three-month earnings along with six-month earnings would assist a long-term investor predict modifications in development earnings. (I take a look at this beneath and discover that they could).
It’s, nonetheless, apparent {that a} short-term investor, one maybe focused on earnings modifications in durations of lower than a 12 months, would profit from realizing three-month earnings. This statement is confirmed empirically beneath.
I begin with the long-term investor, who I assume is within the long-term development in earnings. A pure approach to gauge the worth of getting three-month earnings along with (or as a substitute of) six-month earnings is to mannequin the change in development earnings as a operate of 1 or each, estimate that mannequin utilizing odd least squares, and evaluate mannequin accuracy. On this put up, I exploit R-squared as my measure of match (or adjusted R-squared) — the bigger, the higher.
At any level, the investor is aware of one-half the present development in earnings. That’s, they know the primary 30 months’ earnings of the present 61-month window, my proxy for the development in earnings. And so they know both the final three months of earnings, or the final six months of earnings, or each.
To find out whether or not receiving earnings data each three months versus each six months would assist the long-term investor to raised predict the development, I estimated specs the place the change in 30-month-ahead development inflation is defined by the change in six-month earnings alone plus the prior earnings-trend change (Mannequin 1). In Mannequin 2, the development change is defined by the identical variables plus the three-month change in earnings. Outcomes are proven in Desk 1.
Desk 1. Regressions of development inflation change on 3- and 6-month earnings modifications, 1970:1 – 2025:6.
| Dependent variable = Development inflation (30-month lead) | ||
| Mannequin 1 | Mannequin 2 | |
| Six-mo. change (three-mo. lag) | 0.073 (0.013) | 0.061 (0.013) |
| Three-mo. change | – | 0.124 (0.029) |
| Development change | -0.223 (0.041) | -0.234 (.040) |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.098 | 0.126 |
| Obs | 547 | 547 |
Supply: Robert Shiller on-line knowledge, creator calculations.
Since I’m not focused on inference, I omit dialogue of estimated coefficient values, aside from to notice that they enter with the anticipated signal. However this, I embrace the prior development in earnings to scale back bias in my estimates and normal errors seem in parenthesis subsequent to every estimate.
The important thing result’s that including quarterly earnings (three-month change) improves match — the adjusted R-squared will increase from 0.098 for Mannequin 1 to 0.126 for Mannequin 2. Whereas neither match is spectacular, these outcomes recommend that quarterly earnings might assist the long-term investor predict development earnings. Different measures of match, particularly the Akaike and Bayesian data standards (AIC and BIC), verify that the specification which incorporates 3-month earnings is extra correct.
As for what could also be of curiosity to merchants (short-term traders), one may guess that the three-month earnings change is expounded to the following three-month change. Quarterly earnings modifications are certainly persistent. The scatter in Chart 2 reveals the autocorrelation of quarterly earnings, the place excessive values (earnings modifications larger than 100%) have been eliminated for simpler viewing. The estimated slope is 0.601 (se = 0.031) — the blue greatest match line is flatter than the black 45-degree diagonal line — and the R-squared is 0.361.
Chart 2. Three-month lagged earnings change vs. three-month earnings change, 1970:1 – 2025:6.
Supply: Robert Shiller on-line knowledge, creator calculations.
And on the danger of estimating the apparent, the R-squared of a mannequin explaining 12-month earnings with six-month earnings (from six-months earlier than) is 0.699, whereas together with three-month earnings (from three-months earlier than) improves the match to 0.953.
Value vs. Profit
It’s almost axiomatic that, in most purposes, extra knowledge is preferable to much less. And the outcomes mentioned right here recommend that quarterly earnings include precious data for traders. However producing earnings is expensive.
As regulators contemplate decreasing reporting frequency, they need to weigh not simply the financial savings but additionally the potential losses — losses to traders ensuing from much less transparency and to the economic system ensuing from impaired market effectivity.
Extra to Suppose About
Previous CFA Institute member surveys present clear assist for quarterly earnings.
