After Investing $100 Million Into New VC Companies, Right here’s What I Look For: Conventional However Higher, or Totally different & Glorious.

Editorial Team
4 Min Read


Screendoor has now checked out greater than 1,500 enterprise companies elevating funds, backing roughly 1.5% of them, usually as their first or second largest investor. After I’m scanning a pitch deck I’m mainly trying to put it into one among two buckets – Conventional or Totally different.

Conventional However Higher” means they’re mainly working a playbook which doesn’t seem too completely different from present companies – sourcing corporations in classes thought-about ‘enterprise scale,’ with a portfolio mannequin that has constant stage and possession targets, and ‘worth add’ that mirrors the language different companies would possibly use. After all Screendoor has a watch in the direction of new VCs with identities, backgrounds and networks that are ADDITIVE to the enterprise ecosystem to raised serve founders, so whereas the construction of the playbook is duplicative, the individuals working the playbook aren’t – and that’s the important thing. In these instances we’re asking ourselves, can this particular person/partnership execute a ‘recognized’ playbook higher than incumbents, as a result of it’s not very fascinating to place individuals in enterprise who’re going to be Conventional However Common. Mediocre VCs get rich themselves however they gained’t generate income for his or her LPs, and are, at finest, only a WITHDRAWALS ATM for common startups.

Totally different & Glorious” equates to one thing that doesn’t precisely appear to be different VCs. May very well be pinning their thesis on a class of expertise or sort of founder that isn’t but understood by the funding neighborhood. Or contrarian within the variety of corporations and/or {dollars} invested per firm in comparison with their friends. Perhaps even a powerful POV on what worth they will add that isn’t sometimes obtainable to early stage founders. These companies aren’t carbon copies of the rest on the market. Actually, they in all probability aren’t typically replicable. However they make the most of their distinctive founding companions, fairly often the kind of individuals who would reject – or not get employed by – ‘conventional VCs.’ Right here now we have to torture the fashions to actually perceive the quantitative sensitivities round anticipated efficiency. And the way rapidly the agency can course of new data and modify if parts of their speculation want tuning as soon as in market. However we’re all in favour of taking this threat when the particular person and alternative warrants it.

For those who’re a VC elevating your first fund, and also you suppose you match both of those descriptions, please tell us. I might even ask you straight which one among these you suppose you’re and why.

GET ALL MY POSTS VIA EMAIL (first and free)

Bluesky has the JUICE so observe me there -> https://bsky.app/profile/hunterwalk.com

Share This Article