However in case you’re not intimately aware of the AI business and copyright, you would possibly surprise: Why would an organization spend tens of millions of {dollars} on books to destroy them? Behind these odd authorized maneuvers lies a extra basic driver: the AI business’s insatiable starvation for high-quality textual content.
The race for high-quality coaching information
To know why Anthropic would need to scan tens of millions of books, it is necessary to know that AI researchers construct massive language fashions (LLMs) like those who energy ChatGPT and Claude by feeding billions of phrases right into a neural community. Throughout coaching, the AI system processes the textual content repeatedly, constructing statistical relationships between phrases and ideas within the course of.
The standard of coaching information fed into the neural community instantly impacts the ensuing AI mannequin’s capabilities. Fashions educated on well-edited books and articles have a tendency to supply extra coherent, correct responses than these educated on lower-quality textual content like random YouTube feedback.
Publishers legally management content material that AI firms desperately need, however AI firms do not at all times need to negotiate a license. The first-sale doctrine supplied a workaround: As soon as you purchase a bodily e-book, you are able to do what you need with that duplicate—together with destroy it. That meant shopping for bodily books supplied a authorized workaround.
And but shopping for issues is dear, even whether it is authorized. So like many AI firms earlier than it, Anthropic initially selected the fast and straightforward path. Within the quest for high-quality coaching information, the court docket submitting states, Anthropic first selected to amass digitized variations of pirated books to keep away from what CEO Dario Amodei referred to as “authorized/observe/enterprise slog”—the complicated licensing negotiations with publishers. However by 2024, Anthropic had change into “not so gung ho about” utilizing pirated ebooks “for authorized causes” and wanted a safer supply.