CEOWORLD Housing Affordability Index: 50 U.S. Cities Ranked for 2025

Editorial Team
12 Min Read


America’s Largest Cities: The place Housing Is Most and Least Inexpensive – 2025 Examine

The Rising Burden of Housing Prices
: Housing affordability has change into one of the urgent challenges for American households — and a important metric for executives, traders, and policymakers alike. CEOWORLD journal’s 2025 Housing Affordability Examine ranks 50 of the nation’s largest cities by evaluating weighted median housing prices for householders and renters relative to median family revenue.

For monetary advisors, the “28% rule” stays the rule of thumb: housing funds mustn’t exceed 28% of gross revenue. But throughout a lot of the U.S., this benchmark is now not sensible.

In 2024, People spent a mean of 20.98% of their revenue on housing in accordance with Census Bureau information. However in 47 of the 50 largest cities, residents pay greater than that, with many exceeding the 28% threshold.


Miami: The Epicenter of Housing Prices

Miami has emerged because the least inexpensive metropolis in America for housing in 2025.

Housing-to-Earnings Ratio (2024): 36.02%
Median Month-to-month Housing Prices: $2,025 (householders) | $1,975 (renters)
Median Family Earnings: $66,337

Regardless that prices for householders barely declined year-over-year, rents rose sharply, and with two-thirds of Miami households renting, the affordability disaster deepened. Miami now stands as the one metropolis the place greater than one-third of median revenue is consumed by housing.

For traders and builders, the Miami information indicators each alternative and danger: a market pushed by sturdy demand however more and more stretched family budgets.


El Paso: The Benchmark for Affordability

On the different finish of the spectrum lies El Paso, Texas, the place residents spend simply 20.35% of their revenue on housing — the bottom among the many 50 largest cities.

Weighted Median Month-to-month Housing Fee: $1,016
Median Family Earnings: $59,932
Month-to-month Housing Prices: $985 (renters) | $1,066 (householders)

El Paso displays a mannequin of relative stability between rental and possession prices. For executives evaluating relocation, growth, or workforce prices, El Paso and comparable cities supply a transparent affordability benefit.


Housing Affordability in 50 U.S. Cities, 2025

Metropolis Housing to Earnings Ratio (%) Weighted Month-to-month Housing Fee ($) Month-to-month Housing Prices – Householders ($) Month-to-month Housing Prices – Renters ($) P.c Householders (%) P.c Renters (%) Median Family Earnings ($)
Miami, Florida 36.02 1991.35 2025 1975 32.7 67.3 66337
Los Angeles, California 32.64 2237.3 2736 1958 35.9 64.1 82263
Lengthy Seashore, California 28.72 2185.17 2505 1962 41.1 58.9 91318
New York, New York 28.7 1942.45 2213 1811 32.7 67.3 81228
Oakland, California 28.43 2421.76 2957 2008 43.6 56.4 102235
Boston, Massachusetts 28.4 2314.47 2526 2196 35.9 64.1 97791
Detroit, Michigan 27.1 885.47 688 1091 51 49 39209
Baltimore, Maryland 27.04 1459.71 1582 1345 48.4 51.6 64778
Tampa, Florida 26.91 1886 1874 1898 50 50 84114
San Diego, California 26.84 2483.75 2564 2414 46.5 53.5 111032
Memphis, Tennessee 26.69 1171.78 1058 1263 44.5 55.5 52679
Houston, Texas 26.62 1427.63 1456 1408 40.9 59.1 64361
Atlanta, Georgia 25.69 1887.59 2022 1765 47.7 52.3 88165
Dallas, Texas 25.54 1582.12 1559 1599 42.2 57.8 74323
Austin, Texas 25.52 1922.85 2141 1770 41.2 58.8 90430
Portland, Oregon 25.48 1942.57 2229 1648 50.7 49.3 91478
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 25.46 1284.1 1084 1500 51.9 48.1 60521
Denver, Colorado 25.39 1957.54 2052 1870 48.1 51.9 92504
Las Vegas, Nevada 25.39 1661.96 1642 1688 56.6 43.4 78556
Fresno, California 25.37 1575.09 1597 1552 51.3 48.7 74491
Arlington, Texas 25.24 1564.32 1538 1594 53 47 74388
Bakersfield, California 25.16 1721.51 1730 1708 61.4 38.6 82093
Jacksonville, Florida 24.86 1499.44 1450 1568 58.1 41.9 72389
Colorado Springs, Colorado 24.69 1721.88 1739 1699 57.2 42.8 83672
Columbus, Ohio 24.54 1371.98 1359 1383 45.9 54.1 67084
Fort Price, Texas 24.34 1673.58 1705 1630 58.1 41.9 82503
Chicago, Illinois 24.27 1630.62 1797 1486 46.5 53.5 80613
Seattle, Washington 24.27 2401.28 2948 2007 41.9 58.1 118745
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 24.22 1146.1 1231 1081 43.4 56.6 56792
Washington, DC 24.13 2205.85 2603 1931 40.9 59.1 109707
Sacramento, California 24.13 1837.36 1829 1846 50.8 49.2 91387
Minneapolis, Minnesota 24.1 1560.88 1815 1340 46.5 53.5 77732
Nashville, Tennessee 23.9 1595.44 1527 1669 51.8 48.2 80090
Raleigh, North Carolina 23.83 1689.27 1718 1661 49.6 50.4 85060
San Francisco, California 23.81 2773.9 3336 2448 36.7 63.3 139801
San Antonio, Texas 23.63 1302.85 1223 1389 51.9 48.1 66176
Charlotte, North Carolina 23.39 1684.15 1649 1720 50.5 49.5 86416
Kansas Metropolis, Missouri 23.04 1343.26 1381 1292 57.6 42.4 69958
Tucson, Arizona 23.02 1160.07 1092 1235 52.4 47.6 60483
San Jose, California 22.99 2839.39 2972 2674 55.5 44.5 148226
Virginia Seashore, Virginia 22.55 1776.98 1791 1753 63.1 36.9 94579
Tulsa, Oklahoma 22.48 1141.33 1182 1099 51 49 60930
Omaha, Nebraska 22.38 1336.35 1418 1229 56.8 43.2 71640
Phoenix, Arizona 22.3 1584.13 1490 1712 57.6 42.4 85246
Oklahoma Metropolis, Oklahoma 22.08 1288.58 1372 1178 57 43 70040
Indianapolis, Indiana 21.82 1216.19 1214 1219 56.2 43.8 66900
Mesa, Arizona 21.36 1523.04 1423 1708 64.9 35.1 85580
Albuquerque, New Mexico 20.54 1223.88 1222 1227 62.5 37.5 71494
Louisville, Kentucky 20.38 1142.19 1141 1144 60.3 39.7 67251
El Paso, Texas 20.35 1016.1 985 1066 61.6 38.4 59932

Cities The place Affordability Holds Regular

Whereas most main metros exceed affordability benchmarks, a number of stay aggressive:

Louisville, KY – 20.38%
Albuquerque, NM – 20.54%
Mesa, AZ – 21.36%
Indianapolis, IN – 21.82%

These cities stay outliers, with housing consuming lower than 22% of revenue — making them more and more enticing for companies looking for decrease cost-of-living environments for workers.


Main Metros: The place Center America Struggles

For a lot of giant cities, affordability pressures sit within the mid-20% vary. Dallas (25.54%), Houston (26.62%), Philadelphia (25.46%), and Denver (25.39%) fall into this “center tier” — above the nationwide common however not but at disaster ranges like Miami.

These markets spotlight the nuanced actuality: affordability challenges are usually not restricted to coastal cities, however widespread throughout the U.S.


Excessive-Value Hubs: Los Angeles, New York, and Boston

Different iconic American metros additionally rank among the many least inexpensive:

Los Angeles, CA: 32.64%
New York, NY: 28.70%
Boston, MA: 28.40%

In every case, median incomes fail to maintain tempo with housing prices. For firms, this imbalance raises questions on worker retention, expertise migration, and wage pressures.


What’s Driving Affordability Gaps

A number of systemic components drive the widening hole between housing prices and revenue:

  • Property Taxes and Insurance coverage Premiums – Significantly acute in high-growth states like Florida and Texas.
  • Mortgage Charges – Elevated charges proceed to suppress affordability for householders.
  • Rental Market Tightness – Provide-demand imbalances drive up rents in city facilities.
  • Native Rules and HOAs – Charges, zoning guidelines, and assessments contribute to upward strain.
  • Utility and Gas Prices – Usually missed, however vital in median month-to-month housing expenditures.

For wealth managers and personal fairness leaders, these dynamics affect each actual property funding methods and client spending patterns.


Implications for CEOs, Buyers, and Policymakers

For executives and decision-makers, the 2025 housing affordability panorama has direct implications:

  • Expertise Attraction and Retention – Cities with excessive housing-to-income ratios may even see outmigration of expert labor.
  • Company Growth Choices – Corporations eyeing secondary markets might prioritize affordability as a aggressive benefit.
  • Funding Methods – Institutional and personal traders can capitalize on each scarcity-driven premium markets (e.g., Miami, Los Angeles) and growth-driven inexpensive hubs (e.g., El Paso, Louisville).
  • Coverage Issues – Legislators face mounting strain to stability housing provide, zoning reform, and affordability mandates.

The Nationwide Context

The U.S. housing affordability disaster is unfolding towards a backdrop of generational wealth transfers, city migration shifts, and ongoing inflationary pressures. For ultra-high-net-worth people (UHNWIs) and institutional traders, the developments sign the place capital flows — and political debates — will focus within the years forward.

Notably, the common American family stays under the 28% threshold, however practically each main metropolis exceeds it. This divergence between the nationwide common and concrete realities underscores why localized information — not broad nationwide statistics — should drive govt decision-making.


Methodology: How CEOWORLD Measured Affordability

The research ranked 50 of the most important U.S. cities by:

  • Weighted Median Housing Prices – Combining home-owner and renter prices proportionally.
  • Median Family Incomes – Primarily based on U.S. Census Bureau 1-Yr American Group Survey (2024).
  • Housing-to-Earnings Ratios – Annual housing prices divided by median family revenue.

House owner prices embrace mortgage and residential fairness funds, property taxes, insurance coverage, utilities, and HOA charges. Renter prices embrace contract lease plus utilities and fuels (if paid by renter).

This technique supplies an apples-to-apples comparability throughout markets.


The Government View of Housing in 2025

The CEOWORLD 2025 Housing Affordability Examine reveals stark contrasts: Miami households dedicating over 36% of revenue to housing versus El Paso residents spending simply 20.35%.

For CEOs, traders, and policymakers, the findings are greater than statistics. They’re indicators of workforce stability, client confidence, and funding alternative.

As affordability pressures mount, cities that stability progress with accessible housing will maintain a aggressive edge. In the meantime, luxury-driven markets will proceed attracting world capital — however on the danger of pricing out native residents.

In immediately’s local weather, the flexibility to learn housing affordability developments is now not non-compulsory. For leaders tasked with guiding billions in capital, it’s an important lens by way of which to view America’s financial future.


Have you ever learn?
Finest Nations to Cover Cash.
Nations with the Highest Age Dependency Ratio.
Nations with essentially the most gold reserves.
World’s Most Harmful Nations.

Copyright 2025 The CEOWORLD journal. All rights reserved. This materials (and any extract from it) should not be copied, redistributed or positioned on any web site, with out CEOWORLD journal’ prior written consent. For media queries, please contact: data@ceoworld.biz


Share This Article