Courts Ought to Keep away from Handwritten Orders

Editorial Team
5 Min Read


State and federal courts have adopted plenty of technological advances lately that make it a lot simpler to deal with judicial issues. For example, many courts adopted digital courtrooms full with cameras, displays, and different programs to accommodate distant proceedings. As well as, most courts have adopted digital submitting programs which might be rather more environment friendly than paper submitting programs.  Nonetheless, many courts nonetheless difficulty handwritten orders. Though this is perhaps extra handy in sure circumstances, courts ought to keep away from handwritten orders for a wide range of causes.

Tough To Learn

Maybe an important purpose why handwritten orders must be prevented is that they’re tough to learn. In lots of situations, handwritten orders are written on carbon-copy kinds, and a replica of a kind is perhaps tough for a litigant to evaluate. The method of scanning a handwritten order may also degrade the standard of the textual content on the choice. Furthermore, some judges and judicial workers have completely horrible handwriting, and it’s altogether tough to discern what’s written within the order.

Just a few years in the past, I filed a movement that the decide needed to resolve whereas the entire events had been within the courtroom. The decide wrote out an order that was round a paragraph lengthy, and he advised us we might be capable of see the choice as soon as it was uploaded later that day. Once I lastly seen the choice, I couldn’t make out some essential language within the order. My adversary and I had totally different interpretations of what was written since totally different interpretations of the language had totally different impacts on our purchasers. We ended up needing to request clarification from the courtroom, which wasted extra time than if the courtroom typed out the order and uploaded that as an alternative of a handwritten order.

House Limitations

Handwritten order are sometimes a lot shorter than typed orders. It’s because it normally takes longer to write down a call than it does to sort an order. Accordingly, judges could not embody a lot reasoning round their choices after they select to handwrite an order. This will have important penalties if an order is appealed and if one other decide wants to guage why a decide made a given resolution on a problem.

Typically, litigants can procure the document of oral argument to establish extra context about how a decide arrived at a given resolution.  Nonetheless, not all oral arguments are recorded, and typically judges don’t specify why they determined a sure approach throughout oral argument.  It’s rather more prudent in lots of circumstances for judges to take their time to sort out orders in order that they are often extra complete when deciding how they arrived at a given place.

Enhancing Is Tough

It’s rather more tough to edit a handwritten order than it’s to edit a typed order. If a decide needs to alter one thing in a handwritten resolution, they might must strike out language, embody arrows to added language, and tuck additional phrases into the margins. One time, I noticed a closely edited handwritten order that seemed extra like a treasure map than a judicial order! If judges sort out their order, they’ll simply delete or add textual content earlier than printing out the order and submitting it. This has a a lot cleaner look than a handwritten order in most circumstances.

Clearly, some orders are simply simpler to handwrite. For example, if the events stipulate to objects, it’s normally simpler for the events to write down the objects down and have a decide “so order” the stipulation. Furthermore, for smaller issues, it is perhaps utterly acceptable for a decide to scribble out a short order. Nonetheless, within the majority of circumstances, it’s normally greatest to keep away from handwritten orders for the sake of readability and effectivity.


Jordan Rothman is a accomplice of The Rothman Legislation Agency, a full-service New York and New Jersey legislation agency. He’s additionally the founding father of Pupil Debt Diaries, a web site discussing how he paid off his scholar loans. You may attain Jordan by way of e mail at jordan@rothman.legislation.

Share This Article