Keep in mind the film Dodgeball? That ridiculous scene the place the coach makes his workforce run throughout a busy freeway? The logic: “Should you can dodge visitors, you’ll be able to dodge a ball.”
Europe’s method to AI feels comparable: for those who can survive our labyrinth of guidelines, you’ll be able to survive anyplace.
Conversations with European firms about AI not often start with “What can it do?” As an alternative, they open with a sigh and ask, “Are we allowed to make use of this?”
For many industries, that’s a creativity-killer, however authorized professionals thrive in regulatory swamps. Europe’s swamp is about to turn out to be its aggressive moat.
The paradox: crimson tape as rocket gas
Regulatory complexity round AI hasn’t slowed authorized tech down. AI regulation tech startups attracted practically $2.2bn in 2024 alone, accounting for round 79% of all funding for legal-related startups.
Prevailing knowledge says regulation strangles innovation. In European authorized AI, it’s the other, partly as a result of the business is already marinated in compliance, and partly as a result of nobody outdoors Europe desires to take care of this mess.
Adore it or hate it, the Common Knowledge Safety Regulation (GDPR) has turn out to be the de facto blueprint for privateness laws and formed European legal guidelines, enterprise practices, and digital commerce norms since 2018. It’s influenced information privateness insurance policies additional afield, from Brazil’s LGPD and China’s PIPL to frameworks in Japan and India and even laws in US states like California, Virginia, and Colorado. The extra the EU units world norms, the extra authorized AI programs constructed right here will appear “export-ready.”
On this context, regulation turns into the product, as European legal professionals promote their recommendation on the very guidelines everybody else dreads. In case your AI instruments can evaluation contracts, undertake due diligence, or establish information safety dangers beneath GDPR, they’ll do it anyplace. Authorized skilled requirements, confidentiality and privilege are subsequently protected by the crimson tape.
Past LLMs
The market can also be studying. In keeping with a 2025 Axiom report, 66% of regulation organisations are within the “growing” stage of AI maturity: groups testing proof of idea amid rising energetic use. Solely 21% declare to be at a “mature” stage, actively utilizing AI on consumer work and aggressively increasing its scope and use.
Corporations are starting to determine that general-use LLMs aren’t sufficient to achieve AI maturity, and merchandise tailor-made to particular, well-worn inner processes are important. For easy duties like private organisation and basic fact-finding, generic LLMs perform properly. Below compliance strain, having to navigate complicated workstreams whereas protecting information utterly non-public, they collapse. How might legal professionals justify to purchasers their billable hours, the spine of corporations’ earnings that vary between $500 and $1,500 per hour, in the event that they use ineffective generic LLMs?
The authorized business thrives on curated datasets, guardrails, and mind-numbing precision. Strong, “compliance-by-design” authorized AI, moulded by strict governance, is the one method to function. Regulatory hoops guarantee firms by no means take a shortcut, even when the shortcut was simply strolling in a straight line.
Battle-hardened tech
So, what benefits does Europe have over its rivals in growing authorized AI?
One: belief within the expertise exists as a result of it’s inbuilt an enormous playground fenced by over 6,000 pages of legislative textual content. Past the AI Act, the EU’s Common Product Security Regulation (GPSR), which got here into impact in December 2024, introduced many AI-powered merchandise inside its remit, regardless of specializing in bodily items. Making certain complete consumer security is paramount within the EU.
Noble as they could sound, excessive requirements are maintained as a result of EU regulation and regulation typically scare off unserious startups (and a few severe ones), or nefarious actors within the area. Shoppers valuing compliance pays additional for instruments which have the “We survived Brussels!” badge of honour.
Two: the EU’s AI Act forces companies to prioritise their aggressive moats from day one, making them closely armoured. The Act strikes to determine laws, establish high-risk AI programs, and create particular provisions for general-purpose AI fashions. It distinguishes between AI programs that merely help legal professionals (restricted threat) and people impacting the supply of justice (greater threat).
Three: information guidelines, although a every day migraine for AI engineers, flip privateness right into a promoting level. GDPR’s “privateness by design” precept is intimidating for firms constructing outdoors the EU. However inside, companies have already waded by means of the quagmire by the point the product reaches the market.
Europe’s regulation-first mannequin might turn out to be the worldwide template, or a cautionary story. Solely time will inform whether or not the Dodgeball logic of crossing the busy freeway was the rationale for victory or simply an absurd ceremony of passage. Ultimately, the US and Asia would possibly simply let Europe do the exhausting norm-setting after which copy the great bits with out the complications.
But whereas the remainder of the world sees crimson tape as a nuisance, Europe’s authorized sector sees it as a aggressive observe. Within the world race, Europe’s benefit might not come from having the very best tech. It might lie in having tech that may stand up to the EU’s distinctive model of “for those who die in coaching, you reside in competitors.”