It’s being reported that the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is contemplating a radical shake-up of property taxation, doubtlessly changing stamp responsibility with an annual property levy for houses over £500,000. If that’s true, and all indicators level to a serious announcement on 26 November, then brace your self: the housing market, already subdued, could possibly be in for a serious shock.
The Treasury is scrambling to fill a £30bn black gap. Stamp responsibility could also be on the way in which out – whether or not by means of Labour’s plans or beneath the Conservatives, if re-elected to energy. However don’t mistake this for a tax reduce. As a substitute, we’re prone to see an annual property tax beneath Labour, which might push householders’ payments up by 1000’s of kilos a 12 months. The place are individuals, a lot of whom are already struggling, supposed to seek out that form of money?
It’s not simply property taxes beneath the microscope both. Rumours are swirling a few raid on pension pots — one more quiet try to squeeze extra out of those that’ve saved responsibly all their lives. So we’re now going through a scenario the place individuals could possibly be taxed out of their houses and out of their retirement funds. It’s a double whammy for center Britain.
There’s additionally speak of making use of capital good points tax to primary residences, which might wipe billions of kilos off the UK economic system. That’s not only a housing subject — that’s a nationwide monetary disaster within the making.
And who’s shopping for anyway? First-time patrons are already stretched. Upsizers are hesitant. Landlords are exiting. Building is slowing. So what precisely are we hoping to stimulate? Even with planning permission, builders aren’t constructing — there’s no incentive, no workforce and no confidence.
In opposition to this backdrop, we’re additionally being instructed the Authorities is planning a serious overhaul of the house shifting course of and property company sector. In line with newly appointed Housing Secretary Steve Reed, these large modifications together with obligatory upfront info, optionally available binding pre-sale contracts and an entire raft of minimal qualification necessities for brokers.
Apparently, it will reduce transaction instances by 4 weeks, halve fall-throughs and save first-time patrons £710. In precept, I assist reform — we’ve been calling for extra transparency and professionalism for years. However let’s not faux these are new concepts. Upfront info, logbooks and digital IDs have been floating round for years.
As ever, property brokers shall be anticipated to foot the invoice and choose up the items. We’re instructed it will ‘drive up requirements’, however how about addressing the delays brought on by conveyancing and the dire scarcity of expert trades holding again housebuilding?
In the meantime, if Reeves’ property tax proposals go forward, brokers ought to put together for a flood of downsizers — not by means of selection, however necessity. And make no mistake, these received’t be completely satisfied movers. These shall be pensioners compelled to go away the houses they’ve constructed their lives round. The emotional toll is actual and the political backlash shall be much more so.
We have to act quick. Get the messaging proper. There’s no disgrace in downsizing however it’s tragic we’re even right here. For generations, house possession has been the muse of British society. An Englishman’s house is his fortress, because the saying goes (although that wants rewriting on this modern-day and age!). If we begin taxing individuals out of their houses whereas raiding their pensions and rewriting the principles of company, we’re not reforming — we’re dismantling.
Rachel from Accounts could also be balancing the books, but when she’s not cautious, she’ll tip the entire market over within the course of.
So right here’s my message to authorities: don’t confuse reform with revenue-raising. If you’d like a fairer system, begin by slicing transaction prices, incentivising new houses and supporting expert labour. Don’t punish aspiration. Don’t penalise pensioners. And don’t spring modifications on a sector already shouldering the burden of damaged methods elsewhere. Have interaction with us — the individuals who stay and breathe this market daily — earlier than you’re taking selections that would derail it for years to come back.
Paul Smith is chairman and founding father of Spicerhaart.
Kier Starmer refuses to rule out property tax rise throughout PMQs
