Lacking in Motion? Europe’s Mineral Finance Method

Assist CleanTechnica’s work via a Substack subscription or on Stripe.

How Europe ought to finance transition mineral initiatives successfully and responsibly.

As Europe accelerates its efforts to safe the provision of crucial uncooked supplies important for clear power applied sciences, together with batteries, making certain numerous provide chains will likely be key. A number of initiatives equivalent to Strategic Partnerships, Clear Commerce & Funding Partnerships, World Gateway and ReSource EU wish to construct resilient provide chains, however concrete outcomes are missing.

Taking a look at present progress, the EU is failing to meet up with abroad investments. Since 2020, China has invested over USD15 billion in key battery metals initiatives globally. In distinction, EU firms have invested solely USD1.7 billion, all of it in Argentina.

Regardless of all these mineral initiatives, questions stay: how will the EU convey enough funding to those initiatives effectively, and the way can it make sure that supported mineral initiatives meet the best environmental and social requirements?

To seek out out, T&E commissioned a research analyzing the position of European Export Credit score Companies (ECAs); an necessary participant in de-risking. The research explores EU ECAs’ involvement within the extractive sector and dives into current requirements and gaps.

T&E finds that whereas ECAs are talked about within the EU’s imaginative and prescient to safe minerals strategically, a coherent method to convey wanted mineral initiatives on the bottom is lacking. Additional, present requirements governing ECAs might fall wanting making certain accountable mineral initiatives.

We discover:

• ECAs have to this point performed solely a restricted position within the extractive sector, particularly for crucial uncooked supplies. Even with new raw-material funds in Germany, Sweden and Finland, EU-level coordination stays weak. Beneath the World Gateway, EU’s reply to Chinese language belt and highway, ECA participation should still symbolize solely a really small share of their total exercise, round 5% at most in line with our research.

• The general situation isn’t EU ECA capability however fragmentation. EU ECAs collectively handle over EUR 100bn in official financing help. But there is no such thing as a EU mechanism to deploy this capital , or from different establishments, strategically. In contrast to China, the US or Canada — who’ve adopted ‘whole-of-government approaches’ — Europe isn’t mobilising ECAs along with Growth Finance Establishments, non-public buyers and business to kind aggressive finance packages for home or oversea mineral initiatives. Taking a look at deliberate oversea battery metallic mines, the vast majority of fairness homeowners are primarily based in Canada, Australia, the UK and US.

• Present requirements governing ECAs might fall wanting making certain accountable mineral initiatives. Frameworks such because the OECD Widespread Approaches depart gaps in due diligence, monitoring, disclosure and grievance dealing with. These weaknesses translate into inconsistent practices throughout EU ECAs. Some ECAs disclose solely minimal info on supported initiatives, making it tough to trace impacts or determine their involvement in any respect. Whereas just a few ECAs apply stronger voluntary requirements, that is uneven and beneath what greatest practices for mining contexts.

T&E recommends:

The EU ought to set up a coordinated EU-level method:

• Create an EU “MINVEST” mechanism. Fuse current EU initiatives and transcend coordination to a politically backed, EU-led car that brings collectively miners, refiners, buyers and offtakers. The intention needs to be to curate, de-risk and ship crucial uncooked supplies initiatives, not simply join actors
• Making use of a whole-of-government method to EU ECAs to coordinate financing packages underneath EU or World Gateway frameworks with different finance establishments
• The EU ought to take direct fairness investments in initiatives via mechanisms equivalent to the brand new Uncooked Supplies Centre or via the EIB, selling greatest accessible applied sciences and excessive ESG requirements

The EU ought to guarantee accountable oversight and strong requirements for ECAs:

• Require all EU ECAs to undertake excessive worldwide benchmarks for due diligence (at a min Equator Ideas), which also needs to apply to finance help equivalent to ‘untied services’
• Considerably enhance disclosure of initiatives, possession, due diligence and impression assessments, and set up grievance mechanisms aligned with greatest follow from growth finance establishments
• Use the IFC Efficiency Requirements evaluate to push for sector-specific requirements for minerals, selling eg greatest waste and water administration and on-site audits

Obtain our briefing.

Obtain full report.

Article from T&E.