Medicare Benefit penetration doesn’t translate to decrease hospital margins: MedPAC

Editorial Team
5 Min Read


This audio is auto-generated. Please tell us if in case you have suggestions.

Dive Transient:

  • Increased Medicare Benefit enrollment isn’t related to a change in hospital margins, in keeping with new analysis from congressional advisory group MedPAC.
  • The report launched Friday discovered a small affiliation between greater MA penetration in a hospital’s geographic space and decrease income and prices, however no relationship between MA penetration and a facility’s revenue.
  • The findings throw chilly water on hospital allegations that the privatized Medicare plans are contributing to shrinking margins, particularly for cash-strapped rural services.

Dive Perception:

The share of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in MA has elevated considerably over the previous decade. At the moment, roughly 35 million People, or greater than half of your complete Medicare inhabitants, are coated by the privatized plans, enticed by their extra versatile advantages, out-of-pocket spending limits and prescription drug protection — together with aggressive advertising by insurers.

This development has include issues amongst some lawmakers, affected person advocates and well being coverage researchers. MA prices the federal government more cash than conventional Medicare. There’s proof of profiteering from some collaborating well being plans. Seniors might face greater obstacles to accessing medical care.

And hospital teams have one other fear: that MA plans lead to greater prices and decrease revenues at a time of shaky monetary stability for a lot of services, particularly these in already underfunded rural areas.

Common MA funds to hospitals in rural areas had been roughly 90% of conventional Medicare lately, in keeping with the American Hospital Affiliation.

Citing decrease funds, onerous prior authorization insurance policies and different points, some services are declining to contract with MA plans. Becker’s Hospital Evaluation discovered 27 programs that dropped MA insurers within the first six months of 2025.

But, regardless of hospitals ringing alarm bells concerning the privatized Medicare program, unbiased analyses of how MA insurance coverage impacts hospital financials have been restricted and yielded combined findings, in keeping with MedPAC, an influential group that advises Congress on points involving Medicare.

For its personal research, MedPAC researchers analyzed price report knowledge from hospitals from 2013 to 2023, and in contrast it with MA penetration: the share of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled within the privatized plans in every hospital’s county.

MA plans are incentivized to decrease prices, provided that the federal government pays them per-member, per-month charges, MedPAC famous. The extra cheap healthcare is, the extra the plan will get to maintain for itself. 

That might lead to MA plans negotiating charges for hospital companies beneath what conventional Medicare pays, or decreasing funds in different methods, like downgrading a dearer hospital admission to a less expensive commentary keep, the report says.

However on common, MedPAC discovered that greater MA penetration didn’t have a statistically vital impact on hospital revenue margins. A ten proportion level enhance in MA penetration was related to a 1.3% drop in income — however with a 1.2% drop in prices, too.

For essential entry hospitals and for built-in well being programs working each a hospital and the MA plan it contracts with, there was no relationship between MA penetration and income, revenues or prices.

The evaluation “makes clear that issues about Medicare Benefit harming hospital funds don’t match the information,” Susan Reilly, the vice chairman of communications for MA foyer the Higher Medicare Alliance, mentioned over electronic mail.

“These findings present that Medicare Benefit is delivering for seniors and taxpayers — not driving the monetary challenges some hospitals have raised,” Reilly mentioned.

Nonetheless, MedPAC burdened that the evaluation confirmed associations, not causal relationships, and that the research didn’t embrace all components that may very well be influencing the scenario.

“MA enrollment modifications might have surprising results on [fee-for-service] and MA cost charges,” researchers wrote.

Share This Article