As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face growing complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry vital accountability for making certain robust monetary outcomes for members1. In 2025, plan sponsors should deal with optimizing funding methods, lowering prices, and enhancing participant schooling to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody vital areas akin to goal date fund choice, price transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation traits.
Concentrating on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steering, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines greatest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embody:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluate
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Making the most of all out there data within the evaluate and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Growing efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steering are three key factors to think about. First, as with all funding course of, you will need to perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by gathering workforce demographics, funding behavioral traits — generally present in reviews produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce knowledge. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s objectives for the plan and general funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding selections requires these parts to drive the evaluation and establish TDFs which can be appropriate in your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Courses
We frequently see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by the trouble of discovering an important funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding automobile.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor may choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, fairly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan could be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) automobile with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these selections or oversights lead to plan members paying increased funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding automobile.
We advise plan sponsors contemplate the impression on members of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We advocate plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply larger price transparency and sometimes decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding evaluations observe an identical format: a take a look at the economic system and capital markets adopted by a evaluate of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, adjustments are mentioned. Whereas routine evaluations of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we recommend supplementing with a periodic evaluate of the funding lineup construction, which means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re applied with energetic administration or passive administration. We advise one of these evaluate a minimum of each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Basic Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To guage the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes must be altered. Elements for the dialogue may embody participant group funding data, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Training Assets
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Examine, staff reported spending a minimum of three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that employees’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We now have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages may also help staff enhance their monetary well being and cut back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a big position — notably for workforces the place a big share of the inhabitants just isn’t at a desk – there’s a significant improve within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff searching for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Analyzing Committee Construction and Duties
Employment traits from “the good resignation” to “the large keep” and “the good reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of right now’s workforce. These adjustments additionally negatively impression an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes may fluctuate from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and tasks
- Construct an onboarding schooling guidelines for brand spanking new committee members
- Preserve a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with schooling
- Affirm the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Traits in Litigation and Regulation
With vital provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there’s the potential for brand spanking new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement applications can include tax laws, so will probably be vital for plan sponsors to remain present on potential adjustments.
From a litigation standpoint, two main traits formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to observe plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the providers offered? You will need to be aware that this matter covers each vendor bills, akin to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, akin to selection of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different traits in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal position in shaping the monetary way forward for thousands and thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant schooling, they will improve retirement outcomes and cut back fiduciary dangers. As market circumstances, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making can be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant impression in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric offered herein is of a normal nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a advice to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such data just isn’t assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution just isn’t registered as a municipal advisor beneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
