Sen. Jim Justice of West Virginia and his spouse, Cathy, reached an settlement with the I.R.S. to pay over $5 million in again federal revenue taxes. This settlement comes hours after the Division of Justice’s Tax Division filed a civil lawsuit in federal courtroom towards the Justices for the unpaid taxes. The senator claims that the lawsuit was politically motivated.
Justice, a Republican, took workplace in January 2025, changing Democrat-turned-independent Joe Manchin who selected to not run for reelection. Previous to that, he was the governor of West Virginia, initially as a Democrat after which switching to the Republican get together.
The grievance filed on November 24, 2025, alleges that the Justices owe $5,164,739.75 for revenue taxes from 2009 that had been assessed on November 25, 2015. In 2009, Justice bought certainly one of his coal corporations to Russian coal firm Mechel for $436 million in money and shares.
Trying on the dates could increase questions. First, if the revenue tax was from 2009, why was it assessed on November 25, 2015? Typically, the taxes are assessed when the taxpayer recordsdata their tax returns, with the earliest date being April 15 of the next yr. Some individuals file extensions and file by October 15 of the next yr.
If the tax was assessed 5 years after the due date, it is actually because the tax returns had been filed 5 years late or as a result of there was a reassessment resulting from a tax audit. For the reason that case has been settled, it’s assumed that the Justices should not difficult the evaluation date.
The following in style query could be whether or not the IRS can legally acquire on a tax that’s 15 years outdated. By legislation, the IRS has 10 years from the date of evaluation to gather the steadiness in full. The date of evaluation is used as a substitute of the due date of the tax return as a result of the tax quantity due is unknown till the taxpayer recordsdata the tax return. In uncommon instances of recurring nonfilers, the IRS can challenge substitute for returns (SFR) which acts in its place return with out claiming any eligible deductions. When these SFRs are filed by the IRS, that turns into the evaluation date and the 10-year time restrict begins then.
The ten-year restrict is administratively prolonged in sure circumstances, often when the IRS is forbidden by legislation to gather. The 2 commonest instances are when the taxpayer recordsdata chapter and when the taxpayer recordsdata an Supply in Compromise which proposes to settle the debt for lower than they owe. When both a chapter or Supply in Compromise is filed, assortment actions are stopped till chapter is lifted or a settlement provide is rejected.
However in excessive instances, the federal government can prolong the 10-year assortment statute of limitations by submitting and profitable a civil lawsuit, which is what they did with the Justices. The 2009 tax was assessed on November 25, 2015, and the lawsuit was filed on November 24, 2025, in the future earlier than the gathering statute would have expired.
Lately, the IRS has revered the 10-year statute of limitations. The IRS seldom resorts to civil lawsuits in an effort to prolong the gathering time restrict. The IRS should contemplate resolving a debt internally, along with the financial worth of the lawsuit. If the IRS feels a lawsuit is suitable, they refer the case to the Tax Division of the Division of Justice, which additionally considers the feasibility of the lawsuit earlier than doing so.
So was this lawsuit politically motivated? The senator didn’t present particulars or proof to help this declare.
However Sen. Justice’s public picture could have performed a component within the IRS choice. In response to the IRS Inner Income Handbook, as soon as a choice is made to litigate, assortment personnel ought to take each effort to make sure its success. As a result of they imagine a well timed and profitable courtroom motion can have a constructive impression on voluntary compliance.
Whereas the case has been settled hours after it started, it’s unclear when the tax shall be paid.
Steven Chung is a tax legal professional in Los Angeles, California. He helps individuals with primary tax planning and resolve tax disputes. He’s additionally sympathetic to individuals with giant scholar loans. He will be reached through e-mail at [email protected]. Or you’ll be able to join with him on Twitter (@stevenchung) and join with him on LinkedIn.
