Legislation Companies
Sexual harassment swimsuit in opposition to Polsinelli continues, with out arbitration, after choose’s ruling
A federal choose in Washington, D.C., has refused to toss claims or to compel arbitration in a $20 million lawsuit alleging that Polsinelli retaliated in opposition to a global company lawyer after she reported sexual harassment by two influential companions. (Picture from Shutterstock)
A federal choose in Washington, D.C., has refused to toss claims or to compel arbitration in a $20 million lawsuit alleging that Polsinelli retaliated in opposition to a global company lawyer after she reported sexual harassment by two influential companions.
U.S. District Decide Amir H. Ali of the District of Columbia dominated for the plaintiff, Julia I. Rix, in a Sept. 18 opinion.
Law360 and Legislation.com are among the many publications with protection.
Ali mentioned Rix doesn’t should arbitrate her intercourse harassment claims due to the Ending Pressured Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, which bans enforcement of agreements to arbitrate future claims involving sexual assault and harassment. He additionally mentioned Rix plausibly alleged sexual harassment beneath the D.C. Human Rights Act and infliction of emotional misery beneath D.C. widespread legislation.
Rix’s swimsuit had recognized the harassing companions as Dov Scherzer and Gabriel Dabiri. They’re not with Polsinelli, in line with Legislation.com.
Rix had alleged in her swimsuit that she was “repeatedly hounded” by the 2 companions who needed her to hitch them for after-hours drinks and resort conferences. She was additionally pressured “to endure salacious feedback about her look” and subjected to an undesirable kiss in “one sordid episode” involving Scherzer, the swimsuit alleged.
Rix mentioned she was fired two days after reporting misconduct. The legislation agency mentioned Rix was fired for “lackluster efficiency.”
Scherzer had sought to dismiss the sexual harassment declare beneath the D.C. human rights legislation. Scherzer’s movement to dismiss mentioned many of the incidents alleged by Rix “weren’t even in particular person,” and “none had been profane or threatening,” Legislation.com reviews.
“The allegations in opposition to Mr. Scherzer are the epitome of ‘episodic’ and are nowhere close to ‘sufficiently steady and concerted,’” the movement mentioned.
However Ali mentioned Rix had plausibly said a sexual harassment declare in opposition to Scherzer beneath the D.C. human rights legislation.
“Rix alleges that Scherzer made repeated sexual advances over the course of greater than a 12 months at firm-related and different skilled occasions, that he held casual energy on the agency relative to her, and that his conduct created a piece setting that was intimidating, hostile or offensive. Such allegations are ample,” Ali mentioned.
Rix is represented by Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors. In a press release emailed to the ABA Journal, agency accomplice William A. Brewer III mentioned the choice on arbitration “affirms that victims of sexual harassment are entitled to the general public scrutiny that comes with the judicial system. Julia has proven braveness in standing as much as Polsinelli. Her determination to take action is now translating into safety for her and others.”
Polsinelli beforehand mentioned it takes allegations of harassment and discrimination very severely, and it has reporting procedures in place for such claims. Scherzer mentioned in his movement to dismiss he “vehemently denies” harassment or illegal conduct. Dabiri mentioned in a dismissal movement he “strongly denies” inappropriate conduct, sexual harassment or retaliation.
Write a letter to the editor, share a narrative tip or replace, or report an error.
