The Artwork and Science of DC Plan Funding Design

Since their emergence within the Seventies, outlined contribution (DC) plans in america have developed. One notable change has been a shift in how they develop funding lineups for participant-directed DC plans. Plan sponsors are progressing from merely utilizing generally held funding beliefs to making a construction that deliberately considers the traits and wishes of their distinctive group of contributors.

On this article, I define the method for creating such a construction from an asset class perspective. A key part to considerate DC plan funding design is crafting a diversified funding construction earlier than choosing particular funding automobiles.

Regulatory Basis & Steering for Funding Menu Construction

The Worker Retirement Revenue Safety Act of 1974 (ERISA) mandates that plan fiduciaries act prudently and diversify the plan’s investments to attenuate the danger of enormous losses. By offering a larger diploma of asset class diversification, plan sponsors can allow extra alternatives for contributors who self-direct their retirement account to mitigate funding danger.

For DC plans topic to ERISA, there are a number of prescriptive necessities, together with a principles-based customary of care (obligation of loyalty and obligation of care) that plan fiduciaries should comply with when constructing a plan’s funding construction. Even for plans not topic to ERISA, many plan sponsors take into account the rules set forth underneath ERISA as greatest follow and select to implement them.

Usually, ERISA part 404(c) supplies DC plan fiduciaries safety from the legal responsibility for participant funding decisions if they provide a minimal of three diversified funding choices that bear materially totally different danger and return traits, corresponding to fairness, mounted earnings, and money equivalents.

In follow, it’s fairly uncommon for an funding construction to be restricted to only three funding choices. It is because many funding fiduciaries consider that providing a bigger, diversified alternative set is useful for contributors. Beneath the Pension Safety Act of 2006, sure pre-diversified funding choices, corresponding to Goal Date Funds (TDFs), are thought of certified default funding alternate options (QDIA), which supplies a protected harbor to mitigate fiduciary danger.

The US Division of Labor (DOL) supplies steerage for the collection of TDFs in addition to periodic critiques of continued suitability. The DOL steerage is greatest follow and plan sponsors ought to leverage it when evaluating TDF utilization of their plan’s funding construction. Plan sponsors ought to set up a structured course of that first identifies a TDF philosophy after which critiques participant demographic knowledge, together with retirees, to evaluate and in the end choose an acceptable TDF suite. The identical participant knowledge evaluate can also be helpful when assessing a plan’s core funding construction.

Past ERISA necessities and non-obligatory protected harbor provisions, DC plans’ named funding fiduciaries and their 3(21) funding advisors and three(38) funding managers have wide-ranging funding construction flexibility if selections are made in one of the best curiosity of contributors and beneficiaries. Such flexibility permits for an array of appropriate funding choices, which may be overwhelming for plan sponsors.

Crafting a Sturdy Funding Construction

Whereas the variability of DC plan participant teams’ wants and traits precludes a set system of a “proper” or “incorrect” funding lineup design course of, plan sponsors ought to preserve a prudent and documented choice course of to fulfill their fiduciary obligations underneath ERISA.

A complete design course of is multi-step, calls for engagement by a plan sponsor’s retirement plan committee, and is greatest led by a professional retirement plan advisor who’s dedicated to facilitating committee conversations and getting ready demographic and fund utilization critiques, amongst different duties.

A Pattern Course of in Seven Steps

1. Establish a function & aims assertion

Establish the corporate’s philosophy concerning the DC plan’s main function and aims. Pattern statements and their potential influence on funding construction:

Objective: It is crucial that our DC plan mirror the corporate’s objective to advertise a tradition of “retirement atmosphere.” This may manifest as: lengthy worker tenure, staff who generally retire from our firm, and retirees who discover it engaging to retain their DC plan accounts within the employer’s plan all through retirement.

Potential influence: The aim assertion would possibly recommend that plan asset lessons and TDFs assist a retiree’s must diversify mounted earnings allocations, as a result of mounted earnings sometimes turns into a bigger portion of an investor’s portfolio close to all through retirement.

Objective: It is crucial that our DC plan additional the corporate’s objective of supporting staff as they save and make investments for retirement. We observe that our firm has an extended historical past of using largely early-career individuals, and based mostly on previous expertise, we anticipate excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements from the corporate. When retirements happen, we observe that accounts are faraway from the DC plan shortly thereafter.

Potential influence: The aim assertion would possibly benefit the inclusion of a number of fairness asset lessons and core or core plus mounted earnings as a result of, for the non-TDF investor phase, this design would supply for ample fairness diversification, whereas minimizing the necessity to allocate to separate mounted earnings sub-asset lessons. It additionally would possibly lend itself to a TDF designed for top fairness allocations early in its glide path and low-to-moderate fairness allocations (relative to the TDF universe common) close to the goal retirement age.

2. What % of contributors are enrolled in managed account companies and/or self-directed brokerage accounts?

Participant enrollment in a managed account service is usually low sufficient that it doesn’t affect the plan’s general funding construction, except for making certain the service’s minimal required asset lessons are included. But when the managed account service serves because the plan’s QDIA, and retention within the QDIA is excessive, establish the asset lessons the managed account supplier will use and never use. Carry out a cost-benefit evaluation of together with asset lessons past these required by the managed service supplier.

3. Develop a participant group profile to know the plan’s traders.

A DC plan’s participant group profile must be based mostly on demographics and investor sort. Since every plan’s participant group has numerous demographic traits, don’t depend on participant group averages for info corresponding to age, compensation, training degree, and firm tenure. Analyzing averages typically fails to mirror the breadth of a plan’s distinctive participant group, in addition to any concentrated segments that characterize the biggest variety of contributors.

When creating the participant group profile, consider what greatest describes the largest variety of contributors. Plan sponsors could divide contributors into the next classes:

a. Investor sort

• The “do it for me” sort: Individuals who elect to spend money on the QDIA; any fund with broad asset allocation, corresponding to goal danger or different asset allocation funds; or a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” sort: Individuals who elect to speculate largely in particular person asset class funds or a self-directed brokerage account.

If “do it for me” is the plan’s predominant investor sort, the funding construction could or could not must include greater than the first asset lessons relying on the profile of the “do it myself” traders. For instance, if the “do it myself” traders have a excessive degree of funding proficiency or are more likely to have their very own private funding advisors, the funding construction could also be justifiably extra complete. Nevertheless, relying on the traits and variety of the “do it myself” traders, advert hoc requests from contributors for particular sub-asset class choices and different funding automobiles could also be greatest addressed by providing a self-directed brokerage possibility.

b. Demographic profile

• Establish the quantity and % of contributors by age vary and investor sort.
• Search for any prevalent age cohorts. Understanding the focus in every age cohort can sign consideration for particular wants.

c. Funding proficiency of non-QDIA traders

• Rank the committee’s notion of participant funding proficiency as excessive, medium, or low. Funding proficiency may be estimated based mostly on how nicely the “do it myself” group makes use of non-QDIA asset lessons. For instance, is there a sample of choosing few asset lessons, and does the sample differ by age cohort?
• It’s cheap to anticipate early-career contributors to make use of fewer asset lessons. For this cohort, there’s more likely to be a deal with equities over mounted earnings. It’s cheap to imagine the chosen variety of asset lessons would enhance for mid- and late-career cohorts as a result of diversification and danger mitigation are likely to turn into extra valued.
• One other method to observe funding proficiency is through the use of a scatter plot of participant fairness/mounted earnings allocation splits by age, in comparison with a pattern TDF allocation. The plan’s recordkeeper ought to be capable to present this info. If the scatter plot reveals extensive dispersion from the pattern TDF allocation, it’s cheap to imagine funding proficiency is probably going low. A low diploma of funding proficiency can affect whether or not the funding construction designed for non-QDIA traders may be streamlined by excluding non-core asset lessons, corresponding to commodities.

d. Draw back danger tolerance

Utilizing an identical low-medium-high score system, gauge draw back danger tolerance of the biggest participant phase. Draw back danger tolerance is a important consider intentional funding construction design and QDIA choice.

To assist establish participant draw back danger tolerance, plan sponsors can:

• Evaluation recordkeeping experiences of transfers into and out of funding choices throughout calendar quarters instantly following a market downturn or giant loss in a particular asset class.
• If the business doesn’t require post-secondary training for many staff, draw back danger tolerance is comparatively low and most plan sponsors will eclude asset lessons topic to extra frequent and vital losses. Alternatively, if superior ranges of training are required, plan sponsors could wish to assume a reasonable to excessive degree of draw back danger tolerance.

e. Stability of workforce

If turnover and liquidations by laid-off staff are excessive, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction and any TDFs supplied ought to lean towards a low draw back danger profile.

f. Presence of an outlined profit pension plan

Along with the DC plan, does the corporate additionally sponsor an outlined profit pension plan that it intends to maintain energetic with continued profit accruals? Does it present ample, focused alternative earnings to long-term staff? If sure, does the corporate view the DC plan as “supplemental”? On this occasion, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction of the DC plan could also be restricted to broad, core asset lessons.

4. Evaluation the variety of asset class choices.

The variety of asset lessons must be knowledgeable by the plan’s function and aims assertion and participant group profile, somewhat than proactively setting an arbitrary restrict on the variety of asset lessons. The latter motion might lead to plan sponsors overlooking one of the best pursuits and wishes of “do it myself” traders. As the preferred QDIA, TDFs enable much less engaged contributors, or these with decrease funding proficiency, to keep away from confusion or challenges in making asset allocation selections.

The typical variety of funding choices has declined as a result of contributors who’re much less comfy making knowledgeable funding selections now have larger entry to pre-diversified choices like TDFs or managed accounts. For reference, the typical variety of funding choices (not asset lessons) supplied by plans is presently 21. The three highest ranges by respondents had been:

1. 1 to fifteen choices: 21.5%,
2. 16 to twenty choices: 26.2%
3. 26 or extra: 25.9% 

5. Keep away from sophisticated funding menu design.

If the participant group profile suggests a streamlined funding construction and variety of funding choices, hold the next factors in thoughts.

• A number of funding choices in the identical asset lessons: Supply just one possibility per asset class until the choices include an energetic and passive implementation.
• International fairness and stuck earnings: If the funding construction has separate home and worldwide asset lessons, international asset lessons could lead to unintended overlap.
• Sector, regional, and country-specific asset lessons, excluding actual property funding trusts (REITs): These asset lessons have larger danger publicity on account of their extra particular or concentrated nature and different areas of the funding construction additionally doubtless have publicity to them. Bear in mind that this will result in overlap and unintentional, giant allocations to particular areas of the market.
• Single-commodity asset lessons: If commodities are acceptable for the plan’s funding construction, the diversification impact of together with a automobile with broad-based commodity publicity could assist mitigate the danger related to publicity to a single commodity, corresponding to gold, oil, or small teams of commodities like valuable metals.
• Goal danger: Goal danger funds, which preserve a set or restricted vary of fairness versus mounted earnings, are liable to unintentional misuse by contributors who stay in the identical fund for longer than acceptable, somewhat than shifting to lower-risk, lower-equity allocation variations as their time horizons lower.
• Cash market and secure worth funds: Steady worth funds have traditionally outperformed cash market funds as a result of they’ll spend money on intermediate-term bonds and preserve principal safety by way of wrap insurance coverage. Together with each cash market and secure worth funds can complicate participant asset motion as a result of cash market funds are deemed “competing funds” to secure worth. Steady worth funds don’t allow direct transfers to competing funds corresponding to cash market or different low-duration mounted earnings funds.

6.  Evaluation historic efficiency previous to asset class choice.

Evaluation historic efficiency for the final 10 years of all asset lessons thought of for lineup inclusion to establish asset lessons which can be too risky or topic to giant losses. This may assist the committee perceive their historic patterns and magnitude of good points and losses. Concentrate on the biggest good points and largest losses for every asset class through the 10-year interval. Evaluation the usual deviation for five- and 10-year intervals.

7. Replace the group’s funding coverage assertion to doc permissible asset lessons.

Examine the DC plan’s Funding Coverage Assertion (IPS) to verify it expressly permits the specified asset lessons. Amend the IPS, if wanted, earlier than making funding construction adjustments to the plan menu.

Placing the Participant Group Profile into Observe

Listed below are two potential eventualities and the ensuing pattern funding constructions:

Participant Group A:

• Plan function assertion: It is crucial that our DC plan helps the corporate’s objective of making a “retirement atmosphere” tradition that promotes lengthy tenure of employment with frequent retirements from our firm, and for retirees to seek out it engaging to retain their plan accounts all through retirement.
• Plan presently presents a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” traders characterize 60% of contributors. The most important age cohort is ages 50-80, and contributors have a excessive degree of funding proficiency.
• Eighty % of retirees depart their account within the plan for the long run and take systematic withdrawals following retirement.
• The “do it for me” traders characterize 40% of contributors. The most important age cohort is the 21-40-year vary, and contributors have a excessive degree of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is secure and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Instructed asset lessons:

• Home fairness
  • Massive cap: development, core, and worth
• • Mid cap: development, core, and worth
• • Small cap: development, core, and worth
• Worldwide fairness
  • Massive cap: development, core, and worth
• Fastened earnings
  • Treasury inflation-protected securities
• Worldwide mounted earnings
• Broad-based commodities
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Participant Group B:

• Plan function assertion: It is crucial that our DC plan displays the corporate’s objective of making a tradition that helps staff as they save and make investments for retirement. Our group tends to make use of predominantly early profession individuals. We anticipate and have traditionally skilled excessive worker turnover that leads to few, if any, retirements. When retirements happen, accounts are faraway from the plan shortly thereafter.
• Plan doesn’t presently provide a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” traders characterize 20% of contributors. The most important age cohort is 40-45 years, and contributors have a reasonable degree of funding proficiency.
• Plan presents a self-directed brokerage possibility, utilized by roughly half of the “do it myself” traders.
• The few contributors that stay within the plan previous age 65 have traditionally rolled over their accounts to particular person retirement accounts inside two years post-retirement.
• The “do it for me” traders characterize 80% of contributors and there aren’t any age cohorts with a materially larger focus than others. Individuals are assumed to have a low degree of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is secure and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Instructed asset lessons:

• Home fairness
• Worldwide fairness
• Fastened earnings
• Worldwide mounted earnings
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Empowering Plan Sponsors

Utilizing an knowledgeable, structured funding design course of will bolster DC plan sponsor confidence that funding lineup choice selections are tailor-made to the wants of most plan contributors. The funding menu design course of ought to allow the plan sponsor to really feel educated about how the group arrived at its plan’s funding construction and why, in addition to present the knowledge essential to doc a prudent decision-making course of, a key tenant of fiduciary obligation underneath ERISA.

For those who favored this put up, don’t overlook to subscribe to Enterprising Investor and the CFA Institute Analysis and Coverage Middle.

All posts are the opinion of the writer(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially mirror the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.

The fabric introduced herein is of a common nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The knowledge contained herein was obtained from sources deemed dependable. Such info shouldn’t be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The knowledge contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.

PNC could present hyperlinks to different websites. Content material on such websites is supplied solely for the consumer’s comfort. PNC makes no guarantee of any variety concerning that content material and linking to such content material doesn’t represent or point out sponsorship, endorsement or affiliation in any means.

The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated companies supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation until, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax companies settlement. PNC Financial institution shouldn’t be registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Shopper Safety Act.

“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Picture credit score: ©Getty Pictures / Rudenkoi

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.