Final week, Lindsey Halligan, the appearing/interim/particular/imaginary US Legal professional for the Japanese District of Virginia indicted New York Legal professional Common Letitia James for mortgage fraud, fulfilling a long-held objective of her consumer, Donald Trump.
James is charged with two felonies referring to the acquisition of an funding property in Norfolk, Virginia: one rely of financial institution fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and one rely of creating a false assertion on a mortgage software in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014.
As with the current indictment of James Comey, one other Trump nemesis, the James indictment was so weak that common prosecutors — i.e., ones who’ve really tried legal circumstances — refused to the touch it. And, as in Comey’s case, Halligan was the one lawyer keen to log out on it. So if conservative commentators and Sam Alito(!) are proper, and her appointment was illegal, the case could get dismissed lengthy earlier than trial.
Meet Virginia
Previous to this indictment, it was presumed that Halligan would indict James with respect to a special Virginia property. Invoice Pulte, head of the Federal Housing Finance Company, in addition to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has been spelunking via monetary information of Trump’s enemies, and he despatched a legal referral to Legal professional Common James relating to a home in Norfolk. However apparently Halligan punted on The Case of the Errant Energy of Legal professional, an extraneous doc which erroneously described the property as a private residence, when each different piece of the mortgage software appropriately described it as a rental. Worst Nancy Drew thriller ever!
As an alternative she charged James with mendacity on a mortgage software for a special home in Norfolk, which James bought in August of 2020 for $137,000. She obtained a mortgage for 80 % of the acquisition worth from Outdated Virginia Mortgage (now often called OVM Monetary), which she seems to have paid off in 2024.
In accordance with the indictment, James falsely claimed that she deliberate to make use of the home as a second residence in an effort to decrease her rate of interest from 3.815 to three.0 %, saving herself $17,837 over the four-year lifetime of the mortgage. In a conclusory style, however with out offering any proof, it states that James “knowingly” made false statements on the mortgage doc. This has a sure irony, since James prosecuted Trump for falsely inflating his web price on mortgage purposes, one thing he claimed was a victimless crime as long as the lender was paid in full. The federal government additionally claims that the lowered price netted James simply over an additional $1,000 within the vendor’s credit score at settlement.
The issue is that the indictment yaddayaddayaddas over a number of components of the supposed crime, which strongly means that it was achieved on objective as a result of filling within the blanks would fatally undermine the prosecution.
The Low Rider
Paragraph 6 of the indictment alleges that:
The mortgage was originated by OVM Monetary beneath a signed Second Residence Rider, which required James, as the only borrower, to occupy and use the property as her secondary residence and prohibited its use as a timesharing or different shared possession settlement or settlement that requires her to lease the property or give any individual any management over the occupancy or use of the property.
That language roughly mirrors Fannie Mae Kind 3890, which James nearly actually signed as a part of her mortgage software. It says:
6. Occupancy. Borrower should occupy and use the Property as Borrower’s second residence. Borrower will preserve unique management over the occupancy of the Property, together with short-term leases, and won’t topic the Property to any timesharing or different shared possession association or to any rental pool or settlement that requires Borrower both to lease the Property or give a administration agency or another individual or entity any management over the occupancy or use of the Property. Borrower will maintain the Property accessible primarily as a residence for Borrower’s private use and delight for no less than one yr after the date of this Safety Instrument, except Lender in any other case agrees in writing, which consent is not going to be unreasonably withheld, or except extenuating circumstances exist which might be past Borrower’s management.
Plainly the intent of that rider is that the borrower agrees to “preserve unique management” over the property. So, whereas James couldn’t flip the house right into a time-share or signal an settlement that required her to lease the property, there was no bar to renting it within the quick time period. That’s why the rider says that James agreed to maintain the property “accessible primarily as a residence.”
In actual fact, Fannie Mae revised this rider in 2019 to make it clear that patrons had been free to lease out their second houses on websites like Airbnb. As one mortgage specialist famous on the time, the brand new rider “explicitly” permits for these types of short-term leases of second houses. And so, even when James had rented out the Norfolk property, she most likely wouldn’t have violated the Fannie Mae rider.
However Did James Even Lease Out Her Second Residence?
The quick reply is: We don’t know.
The indictment says that James rented the property to a household of three and picked up “thousand(s) of {dollars} in rents obtained.” That appears intentionally imprecise, suggesting maybe that James netted tens and even lots of of hundreds of {dollars}.
In actual fact, she netted someplace between $1,000 and $5,000, in line with a 2020 monetary disclosure dug up by a “forensic accountant” named Sam Antar. In 2023, Antar was convicted of securities fraud in reference to the Loopy Eddie electronics chain, of which he was CFO. He’s since rebranded himself as an “investigator of economic fraud,” presumably on the speculation of it takes one to know one. (Sure that) Roger Stone’s “Stone Zone” just lately ran an exposé on James drafted by Antar which included such trenchant observations as:
Including to the thriller, James constantly reported this mortgage within the vary of $100,000-$150,000 for 3 consecutive years (2020–2022), however then in 2023, the reported worth inexplicably drops to $75,000-$100,000 with out clarification. Whereas this might doubtlessly be associated to cost of principal, the absence of any official document of this mortgage in ACRIS [New York’s real property registration site] makes it unimaginable to confirm the precise phrases, origination date, and even existence of this substantial monetary obligation.
She paid down her mortgage? Lock her up!
Right here’s Antar’s smoking gun:
Observe that James discloses “rental revenue” for a property in Brooklyn, however describes revenue on the Norfolk property as “funding.” In accordance with the indictment, James rented the property to a household of three. However Halligan by no means says for a way lengthy, and he or she’s fairly hand-wavey about how a lot lease James took in — two issues she nearly actually is aware of, since her predecessor Erik Siebert interviewed a number of witnesses about this case. Earnings of lower than $5,000 is in line with a short-term rental explicitly permitted by the Fannie Mae Second Residence Rider. And certainly the second half of 2020, throughout the peak of Covid, was a time when many individuals had been making advert hoc residing preparations. We merely don’t know what occurred right here. However Lindsey Halligan does know, and he or she selected to not point out it on this indictment.
In any occasion, James has not disclosed any revenue from the Norfolk property, rental or in any other case, since 2020.
The “Crimes”
Suppose for the sake of argument, that James was prohibited from renting the Norfolk property and did so anyway.
The financial institution fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1344, makes it against the law to “knowingly execute” a “scheme or artifice” to both defraud a financial institution or, extra broadly, to acquire funds from the financial institution “by way of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or guarantees.” And 18 U.S.C. § 1014 equally makes it against the law to “knowingly make[] any false assertion or report… for the aim of influencing in any means” a lined mortgage lender.
To convict James, the federal government should not solely show that she lied on the mortgage software, however that she did so “knowingly” and as a part of a corrupt “scheme” to improperly affect the mortgage lender. Prosecutors must present that James knew she was going to lease out the Norfolk property on the time she signed the mortgage software however lined up that reality and that she did so for the aim of defrauding the financial institution into providing her a decrease price of curiosity on the mortgage.
In different phrases, if this case had been to someway go to trial, prosecutors must show past an inexpensive doubt that James concocted a fraudulent scheme prematurely to get an eight-tenths-of-one-percent discount on a modest mortgage that she voluntarily paid off 11 years early … all in order that she may earn a pair thousand {dollars} in rental revenue.
If you say it out loud, it doesn’t make a lot sense. And it’ll most likely make even much less sense when James herself begins speaking.
Subscribe to learn extra at Regulation and Chaos….
Liz Dye and Andrew Torrez produce the Regulation and Chaos Substack and podcast. You may subscribe to their Substack by clicking the emblem:
