Immigration Legislation
Trump administration fires immigration judges, even because it seeks to rent extra of them
Masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement brokers have been seen stalking the corridors on the twelfth ground of Decrease Manhattan’s immigration court docket at 26 Federal Plaza in New York Metropolis on Sept. 8, 2025. (Picture by Selcuk Acar/Anadolu through Getty Pictures)
The Trump administration fired almost 20 immigration judges this month, following the dismissal of greater than 80 judges earlier this yr.
The dismissals come because the administration is in search of so as to add immigration judges by filling jobs with as much as 600 army attorneys. The present backlog within the courts is almost 4 million circumstances, NPR experiences in its article on the most recent firings.
Matt Biggs, the president of the union that represents immigration judges, mentioned in an announcement to NPR the dismissal of extra judges “is an illogical and expensive setback for the nation’s immigration courts.”
“At a time when the backlog has reached historic ranges and the administration has made immigration enforcement a central challenge, the removing of skilled judges is hypocritical, undermines the regulation, wastes taxpayer {dollars} and additional delays justice for residents and immigrants alike,” mentioned Biggs, who’s the president of the Worldwide Federation of Skilled and Technical Engineers.
The variety of departing immigration judges swells when the dismissals are mixed with voluntary resignations. The loss was greater than 125 immigration judges within the final 9 months, down from 700 judges initially of the yr, in response to NPR.
In San Francisco, seven immigration judges have been fired as of Sept. 11, amounting to about one-third of the judges there, the San Francisco Chronicle experiences.
Immigration judges preside in courts overseen by the Division of Justice’s Government Workplace for Immigration Overview. They determine whether or not noncitizens accused of violating immigration legal guidelines needs to be eliminated or granted safety from removing.
San Francisco immigration courts grant reduction to immigrants in 71% of the circumstances, one of many highest charges among the many nation’s largest courts, the article says.
5 of the seven judges fired in San Francisco grant reduction at larger charges than their colleagues. One fired choose had the bottom fee of granting reduction within the court docket.
Sirce Owen, the appearing director of the Government Workplace for Immigration Overview, mentioned in an August memo “statistically unbelievable end result metrics” may point out bias or failure to stick to the regulation, warranting “shut examination and potential motion.”
Government Workplace for Immigration Overview management has additionally criticized judges for failing to handle their caseloads effectively, in response to NPR.
Write a letter to the editor, share a narrative tip or replace, or report an error.
